TL;DR — Plain language summary
A significant clinical benefit has not been demonstrated with the addition of a general multivitamin in dogs being fed a balanced commercial dog food
The science behind it
2 references
The Bottom Line
Dogs that are fed a balanced commercial dog food (e.g. meets AAFCO/FEDIAF standards) do not appear to benefit from the addition of a general multivitamin. This encompasses many health domains including skin/hair coat, gastrointestinal, and joint health/mobility metrics. Over-supplementation of some particular vitamins may also have a negative impact on health (e.g. overdoses of vitamin D), though this is usually the result of accidental large ingestions. However, it should be noted there is minimal research in this area and most literature focuses on the use of a specific vitamin for a specific health condition. Given the scarcity of evidence, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of a routine multivitamin to the average dog cannot be made.
This review does not address the question regarding vitamin supplementation in dogs with specific disease processes, or in dogs being fed an unbalanced diet. For dogs being fed an unbalanced diet, including a raw meat based diet, we recommend reading the review of raw meat based diets here. For owners feeding a home cooked diet with the addition of a multivitamin, we recommend consulting with a veterinary nutritionist.
Of note, there is recent marketing trend of dog foods that do not contain the addition of vitamins and rather relies on organ meat or natural sources for vitamins. This is also not evidence-based, and adherence to AAFCO standards regardless of vitamin source is advised.
References 2
- 1
Tran JL, Horvath C, Krammer S, et al.. Blood vitamin concentrations in privately owned dogs fed non-standardized commercial diets and after intake of diets with specified vitamin concentrations. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2007.
View source - 2
Heaton PR, Reed CF, Mann SJ. Role of dietary antioxidants to protect against DNA damage in adult dogs. J Nutr 2002.
View source
Research Snapshot
Weak
Based primarily on expert opinion, case reports, or "historical use" without controlled testing; multiple negative study results (lack of benefit).
Limited studies evaluating the effects in otherwise healthy dogs
How we grade evidence
| Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|
| A | Highly likely/Proven Benefit |
| B | Probable Benefit |
| C | Emerging / Inconclusive |
| D | Weak |
| F | No evidence of benefit, possible harm |
| n/a | Insufficient data |