TL;DR — Plain language summary
A long-term benefit has not been demonstrated in dogs fed a raw meat based diet. Some dogs may exhibit improved markers of digestibility with this diet. However, significant risks of infectious disease transmission to both dogs and humans have been demonstrated with raw meat based diets.
The science behind it
17 references
Raw Diet Dog: Evidence, Safety Risks, and What Owners Should Know
Feeding a raw food diet to your dog has become increasingly popular, driven by social media influencers, breeders, and marketing that promises a “natural” path to better health. But what does the peer-reviewed science actually say? The current body of research highlights both lack of potential benefits and significant risks associated with raw diets. This article summarizes the current evidence on raw meat-based diets for dogs, and explains why PetEvidenceProject recommends caution.
Quick Answer: Are Raw Diets Safe or Beneficial for Dogs?
Current research does not show meaningful clinical health benefits of raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) over complete cooked diets. The popularity of raw dog food diets is rising despite ongoing controversy about their safety and effectiveness. However, studies consistently identify real safety risks that affect both dogs and the humans who live with them (Lyu et al., 2025; Hiney et al., 2021).
The systematic review by Lyu et al. (2025) analyzed available trials and found reports of improved stool quality and body condition in some animals, but these findings came from small, short-term, heterogeneous studies; not robust long-term clinical trials. Feeding a raw dog food diet, also known as the BARF diet (Biologically Appropriate Raw Food or Bones and Raw Food), is believed by proponents to provide potential benefits such as shinier coats, healthier skin, cleaner teeth, higher energy levels, and smaller stools. However, most of these potential benefits are anecdotal and not based on robust scientific data. Meanwhile, pathogen contamination and nutritional imbalances appeared frequently.
Raw diets can increase:
- Shedding of drug-resistant bacteria that can infect people, including infants and immunocompromised individuals (Bernaquez et al., 2025; Morgan et al., 2024; Karalliu et al., 2024)
- Foodborne pathogens like Salmonella and Listeria in pet foods and in the home (Davies et al., 2019; Nemser et al., 2014; Weese et al., 2005)
- Risk of unbalanced nutrition, especially in puppies and large-breed growing dogs (Vecchiato et al., 2022; Główny et al., 2024). Creating a balanced raw meal at home is challenging, with studies showing most homemade recipes are nutrient-deficient.
PetEvidenceProject is an evidence-based, vet-driven resource. This article summarizes peer-reviewed data, not marketing claims. Owners who still choose raw should only do so under guidance of a veterinarian and, ideally, a board-certified veterinary nutritionist.
What Is a Raw Diet for Dogs (and Why Has It Become Popular)?
A raw dog food diet typically consists of uncooked muscle meat, organs, and bones. These are often marketed as BARF (Biologically Appropriate Raw Food) or “prey model” diets designed to mimic what wolves eat in the wild.
Common forms include:
- Commercial products: Frozen raw patties, chubs, or freeze dried options sold in pet stores
- Homemade raw diets: Mixes based on online recipes or ratio charts (e.g., 70% meat, 10% bone, 10% organs, 10% vegetables)
Survey data reveals that many owners switch to raw feeding because they believe it’s “natural,” closest to a wolf’s diet, or healthier than commercial food. Most rely on social media or breeders rather than veterinarians for advice (Morelli et al., 2019).
A diet change to raw feeding should be approached gradually to support gut health and allow the gut microbiome to adjust. Transitioning your dog to a raw diet is best done over 7-14 days, starting with a small amount of raw food mixed with the current diet and slowly increasing the raw food ratio. During this period, it is normal to see some variation in stool consistency as your dog’s body adapts. Many dogs handle a change in diet with ease, while others may experience some difficulties during the transition.
However, microbiome studies show dogs switching to raw exhibit only partial, temporary convergence toward wolf gut flora. Dogs are not wolves: they’ve adapted to starch digestion and modern living over thousands of years of domestication (Xu et al., 2021).
“Natural” does not equal safer or better studied. Most raw products face far less regulation for pathogens and nutrient balance than conventional complete diets.
Raw Diet Ingredients: What Goes Into a Typical Raw Dog Diet?
A typical raw dog food diet is built around a variety of fresh, uncooked ingredients designed to mimic what a dog’s ancestors might have eaten in the wild. The foundation of most raw diets is raw meat - often muscle meat from sources like beef, lamb, chicken, pork, turkey, or fish. Alongside muscle meat, raw bones such as chicken necks or knuckle bones are often included.
Organs, including liver and kidneys, are also often included, touting claims that organ-derived vitamins and minerals provided added nutritional benefit compared to non-organ derived equivalents (largely unproven claims). Many raw dog food diets also incorporate small amounts of fruits and vegetables, such as apples, carrots, or leafy greens, as well as added vitamins and minerals.
A key distinction within raw meat based diets is: are they commercial raw meat based diet, or a home-cooked raw meat based diet? Many home cooked diets, whether raw or otherwise, have demonstrated to be nutritionally imbalanced and lack essential nutrients. Commercial raw diets, as long as they meet AAFCO minimum standards for life-stage, should be nutritionally complete.
What Does the Science Actually Show About Benefits of Raw Diets?
A few small trials and observational studies have reported differences in microbiome composition and stool appearance in raw-fed dogs. However, robust clinical outcome benefits remain unproven.
Key findings from systematic reviews:
- Lyu et al., 2025: This meta-analysis found limited, heterogeneous evidence, primarily from short-term studies. While it reported improved stool scores, it identified frequent concerns regarding pathogen contamination and nutritional imbalances (Lyu et al., 2025).
- Główny et al., 2024: This review highlights that while there are theoretical benefits to raw feeding, they are accompanied by equally significant threats. It emphasizes that all pros and cons must be carefully weighed by pet owners and clinicians (Główny et al., 2024).
In addition to the findings above, proponents of raw dog food diets frequently cite a range of potential benefits. These include superior nutrient bioavailability and the presence of live enzymes compared to processed foods, high protein content that may help maintain lean muscle mass, improved digestion, healthier skin, and better weight management. Many owners also report cleaner teeth, fresher breath, reduced systemic inflammation, and enhanced immune system support. Some claim that raw diets can reduce allergies and ear infections later in life and provide essential nutrients often missing in commercial dog foods. However, it is important to note that these potential benefits are mostly anecdotal and not yet supported by robust clinical evidence. It is also unclear if these benefits were from switching from an extruded kibble diet to raw diet, or if this was due to some other factor (e.g. switching to a different protein and elimination of a protein-related allergy).
Studies finding no clear clinical advantage in healthy adult dogs:
- Hiney et al., 2021: Cross-sectional study found raw-fed dogs had only a small improvement in a composite skin/ear/dental score, but this was confounded by higher owner management (more supplements, sporting activities) in the raw group
- Algya et al., 2018: Raw and lightly cooked diets were highly digestible and well tolerated, but dogs remained healthy on all diets tested, including extruded kibble
Often-repeated claims about cancer prevention, dramatic allergy reduction, or extended lifespan are not backed by controlled clinical trials as of 2025. The gap between “absence of evidence of benefit” and marketing narratives remains wide (Jobe & Downs, 2025).
Current peer-reviewed data do not justify feeding raw primarily for health improvement when safer, well-studied complete cooked diets exist.
Major Safety Risks of Raw Diets for Dogs and People
From a One Health perspective, decisions about your dog’s diet affect the whole household and wider public health through zoonoses and antimicrobial resistance. Disease control is a critical concern, and major health organizations such as the CDC and FDA advise against raw diets due to the risks of bacterial contamination. Raw-fed pets are more likely to shed antibiotic-resistant bacteria, increasing risks to humans. In addition, veterinary medicine and organizations like the AVMA generally discourage feeding raw diets because of these health risks.
Key risk categories:
- Zoonotic infection in humans from contaminated raw food or dog feces
- Antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria carried and shed by raw-fed dogs
- Nutritional imbalances with particular concern for puppies and breeding animals
- Physical hazards like bone obstructions or perforations
- Increased risk for vulnerable humans: infants, older adults, pregnant people, and immunocompromised individuals
Risk 1: Dogs on Raw Diets as Sources of Salmonella and Other Pathogens to Humans
Real-world data demonstrates serious health risks. A 2025 genomic epidemiology study linked 20 human Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- ST34 infections (half in infants) to dogs fed RMBDs in Canada. The raw dog food was identified as the major source compared with cattle exposure (Bernaquez et al., 2025).
Many affected dogs were asymptomatic, not appearing sick, yet shedding a multi-drug-resistant strain with limited treatment options and environmental persistence risks. Dogs can carry Salmonella in their intestines without showing signs of illness, serving as a reservoir for ongoing exposure to humans in the household.
Food testing studies show frequent contamination:
- Nemser et al., 2014 (U.S.): Testing found 66/576 samples positive for Listeria and 15 for Salmonella. All contaminated samples originated from raw foods or jerky treats, with no positive findings in dry kibble (Nemser et al., 2014).
- Weese et al., 2005 (Canada): Investigation revealed that 20% of commercial raw diets contained Salmonella, while coliforms and E. coli were present in every raw sample tested (Weese et al., 2005).
- Morgan et al., 2024 (UK): Research identified high levels of Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella in raw products, whereas no Enterobacteriaceae were detected in cooked kibble samples (Morgan et al., 2024).
Dogs can shed harmful bacteria in their feces without any signs of illness, contaminating floors, yards, and hands after handling raw food or picking up stool (Davies et al., 2019).
Infants crawling on floors, toddlers with hand-to-mouth behavior, older adults, pregnant people, and immunocompromised household members face particular risk for severe disease. Households with any vulnerable humans should absolutely avoid raw meat diets for pets altogether.
Risk 2: Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria and One Health Concerns
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) means fewer effective antibiotics for human infections. When pets carry and shed resistant bacteria, they contribute to this public health crisis.
Morgan et al., 2024 found in UK dog foods:
- Raw meat diet samples contained Enterobacteriaceae counts >5,000 CFU/g
- 39% carried antimicrobial-resistant E. coli
- 14% carried ESBL-producing strains
- blaCTX-M-15, a key ESBL gene of human clinical importance, was commonly identified
A systematic review found feeding raw was the second most common significant risk factor for AMR-Enterobacterales carriage in dogs, after prior antimicrobial use, appearing in 9 of 14 studies examined (Karalliu et al., 2024).
Choosing raw increases the chance your dog will carry and shed drug-resistant bacteria, with implications extending beyond your own household.
Risk 3: Nutritional Imbalances and Deficiencies (Especially in Puppies)
Unlike complete commercial diets meeting AAFCO or FEDIAF profiles, many RMBDs—commercial and homemade—are not evaluated as a complete and balanced diet.
Vecchiato et al., 2022 assessed 10 commercial RMBDs in Italy:
- Every diet had at least one nutritional adequacy concern
- Mean fat content was 69 g/Mcal (range 33–95), often displacing protein
- High energy density risks pancreatitis in susceptible dogs
Główny et al., 2024 identified concerns for growing and breeding animals:
- Raw meat alone provides improper calcium-to-phosphorus ratio for puppies, predisposing to skeletal deformities
- Poor semen quality and estrus cycle problems associated with imbalanced raw diets
- Thyroid tissue in neck/head meat can cause hyperthyroidism
Homemade raw diets from internet recipes frequently fail to provide essential nutrients including vitamin D, iodine, copper, zinc, and appropriate calcium.
Puppies (especially large and giant breeds), pregnant/lactating dogs, and animals with health conditions are at highest risk. Never feed homemade raw diets to growing dogs without a veterinarian or board-certified nutritionist designing and monitoring the recipe.
Risk 4: Bones and Physical Hazards in Raw Diets
Many BARF and prey model plans promote raw meaty bones as calcium sources and for dental cleaning. However, documented risks include:
- Esophageal foreign bodies requiring endoscopy or surgery
- Gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation leading to peritonitis
- Dental slab fractures from chewing hard bone, requiring veterinary dentistry
Safer, evidence-based dental care options exist (VOHC-accepted chews, tooth-brushing). From a risk-benefit perspective, PetEvidenceProject does not recommend feeding raw bones for routine nutrition or dental health.
Does Using Kill-Steps Like High-Pressure Processing (HPP) Make Raw Diets Safe?
HPP is a non-thermal method using very high pressure to reduce bacteria while keeping food raw in appearance and texture.
Serra-Castelló et al., 2023 found:
- HPP significantly reduced endogenous microbial groups to below detection
- Salmonella control improved without major visible changes to meat color
However, limitations exist:
- Lab-scale studies cannot guarantee complete real-world safety along production, storage, and home-handling chains
- HPP does not fix nutrient imbalances, excessive fat, or bone hazards
- Recontamination can occur after processing
HPP and other kill step methods may reduce—but not eliminate—microbiological risks. They do not turn a raw diet into a risk-free choice or address the lack of proven health benefits.
Why “Raw vs Kibble” Is Often Framed Misleadingly
Many pro-raw messages blame “processing” and “additives” for chronic diseases without distinguishing between different diet types or levels of evidence.
Jobe & Downs, 2025 meta-analysis found:
- No evidence that approved additives cause harm within AAFCO guidelines
- Effects of processing vary by ingredient and method—sometimes beneficial (pathogen kill, improved digestibility)
- Blanket claims that “processing = toxic” are not evidence-based
High-quality extruded or gently cooked diets can be highly digestible, nutritionally complete, and tailored for specific medical conditions with clinical trial support.
The real comparison should be:
- Evidence-based, complete, tested cooked diets vs.
- Raw diets with unproven benefits, known pathogen risks, and frequent nutrient gaps
If You Still Choose to Feed Raw: Risk-Reduction Strategies
Some dog owners will opt for raw for philosophical or palatability reasons. Here are strategies to reduce preventable harm:
- Consult your veterinarian and consider referral to a board-certified veterinary nutritionist
- Choose commercial products with AAFCO/FEDIAF nutritional adequacy statements and validated pathogen control (HPP or equivalent) - though realize that these products still carry higher risk of disease transmission.
- Avoid feeding raw in homes with infants, adults over 65, pregnant people, or immunocompromised individuals
- Never feed homemade raw diets to puppies without formal veterinary nutrition oversight
- Avoid weight-bearing long bones and hard marrow bones; supervise any bone feeding
- Enforce strict hygiene: Thaw in the refrigerator, disinfect cutting boards and prep areas, wash hands and dishes with soap thoroughly
- Pick up dog feces promptly and wash hands after handling
If you feed your dog a raw diet, it is important to select appropriate portions and understand how to serve raw food, including frozen patties and ground meat, to ensure a balanced nutritional intake. Whole foods are valuable in providing unprocessed nutrition, but supplements are often needed to fill in nutritional gaps that can occur in a raw diet.
Even with these steps, risk cannot be reduced to the level of properly cooked, tested diets. Extreme caution is advised.
How PetEvidenceProject Recommends Choosing a Diet for Your Dog
For most healthy adult dogs, the safest and best-supported options are:
- Commercial diets meeting AAFCO/FEDIAF nutrient profiles or passing feeding trials, manufactured with robust quality control
- In certain circumstances: carefully formulated home-cooked diets created by veterinary nutrition professionals (not ad-hoc internet recipes). Generally only for dogs with veterinary-diagnosed conditions for which a home cooked diet is indicated.
For puppies, pregnant/lactating dogs, and animals with chronic disease, diets with published clinical evidence and predictable nutrient content are especially important. Raw food diets often fail to meet these minimum requirements and may pose an even higher risk of disease transmission in these populations.
We encourage owners to:
- Discuss any interest in raw or “fresh” diets with your veterinarian before switching. Consider consultation with a board certified veterinary nutritionist.
- Share product labels so your vet can help interpret marketing claims
- Be skeptical of anecdotal testimonials and focus on peer-reviewed research
Final Thoughts
Raw diets for dogs currently offer no clearly proven clinical advantages over complete cooked diets but carry documented microbiological, nutritional, and One Health risks. Until high-quality, long-term clinical trials demonstrate net benefit, PetEvidenceProject recommends prioritizing diets whose safety and efficacy are supported by robust evidence.
Talk to your veterinarian today about the best evidence-based nutrition plan for your dog’s health and your family’s safety.
The Bottom Line
Based on the available evidence, raw food diets have not demonstrated a benefit at the population-wide level. Some dogs may have improved markers of digestibility and a mild improvement in some markers of skin health, though it is unknown in these cases if it was the raw food diet that was of benefit, or elimination of an allergen in the previous diet. Growing puppies require carefully balanced calcium:phosphorous ratios, which may not be present in raw diets. Raw diets do not appear nutritionally appropriate for young growing dogs.
The health risks posed to animals from raw food diets are significant and includes the potential for transmission of highly pathogenic salmonella bacteria to humans, which may result in serious, life-threatening infections in at-risk individuals. Furthermore, there have been serious reports of human illness related to dogs receiving a RMBD, even if the dog is asymptomatic (subclinical carriers of disease). Owners should carefully evaluate the risks to their own health when considering a raw food diet for their pet. Consultation with both their veterinarian and personal physician is recommended prior to considering a raw meat based diet.
References 17
- 1
Bernaquez I, Dumaresq J, Picard I, et al.. Dogs fed raw meat-based diets are vectors of drug-resistant Salmonella infection in humans. Commun Med (Lond) 2025.
View source - 2
Lyu Y, Wu C, Li L, Pu J.. Current Evidence on Raw Meat Diets in Pets: A Natural Symbol, but a Nutritional Controversy. . Animals (Basel) 2025.
View source - 3
Główny D, Sowińska N, Cieślak A, et al. Raw diets for dogs and cats: Potential health benefits and threats.. Pol J Vet Sci. 2024.
View source - 4
Davies RH, Lawes JR, Wales AD.. Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards.. J Small Anim Pract. 2019.
View source - 5
Hiney K, Sypniewski L, Rudra P, et al.. Clinical health markers in dogs fed raw meat-based or commercial extruded kibble diets. . J Anim Sci. 2021.
View source - 6
Morelli G, Bastianello S, Catellani P, Ricci R.. Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners' motivations, attitudes and practices.. BMC Vet Res. 2019.
View source - 7
Fredriksson-Ahomaa M, Heikkilä T, Pernu N, et al.. Raw Meat-Based Diets in Dogs and Cats.. Vet Sci. 2017.
View source - 8
Vecchiato CG, Schwaiger K, Biagi G, Dobenecker B.. From Nutritional Adequacy to Hygiene Quality: A Detailed Assessment of Commercial Raw Pet-Food for Dogs and Cats.. Animals (Basel). 2022.
View source - 9
Sandri M, Dal Monego S, Conte G, et al.. Raw meat based diet influences faecal microbiome and end products of fermentation in healthy dogs. . BMC Vet Res. 2017.
View source - 10
Weese JS, Rousseau J, Arroyo L.. Bacteriological evaluation of commercial canine and feline raw diets.. Can Vet J. 2005.
View source - 11
Xu J, Becker AAMJ, Luo Y, et al.. The Fecal Microbiota of Dogs Switching to a Raw Diet Only Partially Converges to That of Wolves.. Front Microbiol. 2021.
View source - 12
Karalliu E, Chung KY, MacKinnon B, et al.. Risk factors for antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales in dogs: a systematic review.. Front Vet Sci. 2024.
View source - 13
Nemser SM, Doran T, Grabenstein M, et al.. Investigation of Listeria, Salmonella, and toxigenic Escherichia coli in various pet foods.. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014.
View source - 14
Serra-Castelló C, Possas A, Jofré A, et al.. High pressure processing to control Salmonella in raw pet food without compromising the freshness appearance: The impact of acidulation and frozen storage. . Food Microbiol. 2023.
View source - 15
Algya KM, Cross TL, Leuck KN, et al.. Apparent total-tract macronutrient digestibility, serum chemistry, urinalysis, and fecal characteristics, metabolites and microbiota of adult dogs fed extruded, mildly cooked, and raw diets. J Anim Sci. 2018.
View source - 16
Jobe MT, Downs KM. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Claims Associated with Fresh Pet Food: Evaluating Scientific Evidence for Additives, Ingredient Quality, and Effects of Processing in Pet Nutrition.. Animals (Basel). 2025.
View source - 17
Morgan G, Pinchbeck G, Taymaz E, et al.. An investigation of the presence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae in raw and cooked kibble diets for dogs in the United Kingdom.. Front Microbiol. 2024.
View source
Research Snapshot
No evidence of benefit, possible harm
High-quality studies have been performed and failed to show a difference compared to a placebo. Or, harmful effects have been documented.
Multiple studies demonstrated risk of transmission of pathogenic bacteria from dogs to humans.
How we grade evidence
| Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|
| A | Highly likely/Proven Benefit |
| B | Probable Benefit |
| C | Emerging / Inconclusive |
| D | Weak |
| F | No evidence of benefit, possible harm |
| n/a | Insufficient data |