TL;DR — Plain language summary
There was insufficient evidence to determine the presence of short or long term beneficial effects compared to traditional diets. There was also insufficient evidence to determine whether air-drying sufficiently improved food safety, though in general it appeared to reduce bacterial load compared to raw meat based diets.
The Bottom Line
Air-dried diets were poorly studied in the veterinary literature and no clinical comparisons between air-dried vs. commercial extruded kibble were available for comparison. A single clinical trial evaluated the presence of inflammatory by-products in urine and found minimal difference. Regarding safety, these diets were also poorly studied compared to the freeze dried raw and raw counterparts, though general food safety studies have demonstrated that air-drying alone is insufficient to eliminate pathogens compared to traditional bacterial elimination methods. This suggests that air-dried diets alone (without additional bacterial elimination techniques) may still pose an increased risk of bacterial transmission compared to extruded kibble, though data is extrapolative.
References 3
- 1
Bridglalsingh S, Archer-Hartmann S, Azadi P, et al.. Association of four differently processed diets with plasma and urine advanced glycation end products and serum soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products concentration in healthy dogs.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2024.
View source - 2
Algya KM, Cross TL, Leuck KN, et al.. Apparent total-tract macronutrient digestibility, serum chemistry, urinalysis, and fecal characteristics, metabolites and microbiota of adult dogs fed extruded, mildly cooked, and raw diets.. J Anim Sci 2018.
View source - 3
Alp D, Bulantekin Ö.. The microbiological quality of various foods dried by applying different drying methods: a review.. Eur Food Res Technol 2021.
View source
Related Reviews
Research Snapshot
Weak
Based primarily on expert opinion, case reports, or "historical use" without controlled testing; multiple negative study results (lack of benefit).
no direct studies that evaluated the benefits of air-dried food
How we grade evidence
| Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|
| A | Highly likely/Proven Benefit |
| B | Probable Benefit |
| C | Emerging / Inconclusive |
| D | Weak |
| F | No evidence of benefit, possible harm |
| n/a | Insufficient data |